Feedback

Community District

Find the planning projects in your community district.

Search or View map

All Projects

421-a tax incentive programRSS

The 421-a tax incentive program was created in 1971 to encourage housing development at a time when the housing market was weak. To spark residential development, the city started the 421-a program, which offered property tax exemptions to those willing to construct apartment buildings. In the mid-1980s, as the real estate market began heating up in certain neighborhoods, the city began to tweak the program. The focus shifted away from encouraging all development toward the need for affordable housing. In 1985 the city decided that in much of Manhattan – the so-called exclusion zone – developers would have to build a certain amount of affordable housing in order to qualify for the tax benefit. More recently, the zone was expanded to include areas in Manhattan between Houston Street and 96th Street, as well as the Greenpoint section of Brooklyn. Developers working inside the exclusion zone can meet the affordable housing requirement by either designating 20 percent of new projects as affordable housing, or by building a corresponding amount of affordable housing in other areas in the city. Outside the exclusion zone, any one building is still eligible for the original incentives, with no affordable housing requirement. Also, developers building in certain neighborhoods with historically dire housing problems – known as “neighborhood preservation” areas – qualify for extra incentives.

In December 2006, after weeks of negotiation, the City Council overwhelmingly approved a compromise measure that sought to balance the desire to update the program by eliminating unneeded incentives for "luxury" housing without stifling the construction boom. Under the compromise, the geographic exclusion zone was expanded to include several areas in Manhattan above 96th Street and all of Downtown Brooklyn, the neighborhoods of Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Boerum Hill, Park Slope, most of Fort Greene, Prospect Heights, Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Sunset Park, Bushwick, and the waterfront from Red Hook to the waterfront of Long Island City, Queens. The bill also added an income cap to luxury housing developments seeking inclusion in the program.

Additional new provisions in the 421-a bill would grant 25 years of benefits only to developments that provide affordable housing, ensuring for the first time that 421-a provides an incentive for low-income housing throughout the city. In addition, the new program creates a $400 million Affordable Housing Trust Fund, targeted primarily to build in the 15 poorest neighborhoods in the city in areas outside the Geographic Exclusionary Zone. Some council members wanted an affordable housing requirement citywide, but the administration and Speaker Christine Quinn opposed that as too restrictive.

The State Legislature & Governor must approve any changes to the 421a program, as well as renew the program before it expires in December 2007. The Legislature passed 421a legislation at the end of their session in June 2007, however this legislation differed from the compromise bill worked out by the City Council and Mayor Bloomberg. Specifically, in Albany’s bills, the exclusion zone was increased, the Atlantic Yards development would receive the 421a tax break without having to build affordable housing, and government-supported middle-income housing was not made eligible for the program. Mayor Bloomberg had urged Governor Spitzer to veto that bill.

However, the confrontation is not likely to reach that point as the Mayor and Assemblyman Vito Lopez, Chair of the Assembly Housing Committee who spearheaded the State’s original bill, have reached a compromise. The terms, announced in early August 2007, allow for an expanded exclusion zone, ensure that government-supported middle-income housing will be eligible for the program, guarantee 35 years of affordability for subsidized units, and require the Atlantic Yards project to build affordable housing to qualify for the 421a program.

The Legislature is expected to take up this compromise legislation when it returns to Albany in September 2007.

Deadline Nears For Development Before Changes to 421-a

Developers are racing to get multi-family structures in the ground to qualify for 421-a benefits before the code changes go into effect. Some that will not make the June 30th deadline are working around the change in benefits, mainly by splitting up construction into smaller units or eliminating some amenities. On July 1st, the Geographic Exclusion Area (GEA) will expand in an effort to produce more affordable housing in traditionally non-affordable neighborhoods. Some experts believe that the new GEA will only limit construction overall, which is already struggling because of the credit crisis.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Industry Experts Disagree on Effects of 421-a Changes

Changes to the 421-a tax abatement program and a slowing residential development market have resulted in some real estate developers reconsidering their plans to develop certain sites. Any developers who have not laid the foundations for multi-unit structures by June 30 will have to comply with more stringent restrictions in order to receive the tax abatement for 10 to 15 years. However, some believe that the current conditions of the market will deter developers from building right now. Some brokers say that they are in the process of trying selling many more of these sites than usual. Brad Lander, director of the Pratt Center for Community Development, argues that the changes in 421-a will not have as significant an effect as the developers and brokers claim. Lander said that “this is an utterly disingenuous argument that developers make because they like to cry about the need for public subsidy."

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

State Senator Krueger Joins Rally Against Illegal Hotels

A rally of the Illegal Hotels Working Group was held on Sunday to call attention to a report that documents the problem of illegal hotels in New York City. The rally was attended by New York State Senator Liz Krueger who said that illegal hotels are especially problematic given Manhattan’s affordable housing crisis, adding that 5,000 to 10,000 residential units are currently being used for short-term “hotel” occupancy. The term “Illegal hotel” refers to a building zoned for residential use where units are being rented out on a short-term basis. The report includes a study of 206 buildings that are operating as “illegal hotels” and finds that 20 of those buildings’ owners have also wrongfully received tax abatements through the 421-a affordable housing program. Stays of 30 days or more are actually considered permanent residency by the Department of Buildings, and are thus not illegal. But Senator Krueger suggested that even these relatively longer-term rentals were a problem, especially if the owner of the building profits from affordable housing tax abatement programs.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Reconfigured 421a Program Goes into Effect in June

Affordable housing developers will no longer receive tax abatement certificates as part of the 421a program starting June 30. The tax abatements will now only be available for developers who build affordable apartments at the same location as market rate housing. While they will no longer be able to sell the certificates, a trust fund of $400 million is being created that uses tax money from market rate buildings in exclusion areas that would have qualified for the abatements had affordable units been built. This revamping of the program aims to involve more affordable housing developers into the program who previously were unable to take advantage of the certificate program. Some believe it may make it more difficult to build affordable housing.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Sale of Existing 421a Certificates Sold

Fifty 421a tax exemption certificates were sold for $1.35 million by Massey Knakal Realty Services. Due to the recent change in the program, developers are willing to pay large sums of money for certificates issued in 2006.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

421-a Revisions May Impact Downtown Brooklyn Development

As the downtown area of Brooklyn is slated for economic development, some worry that changes in the 421-a tax abatement program and conditions in the credit market will hinder the future development. Projects that begin construction after June 30, 2008 will only be eligible for 421-a benefits if they are receiving government subsidy under an affordable housing program, apportion a minimum of 20% of their units as affordable, or have purchased negotiable certificates contracted prior to December 28, 2007. Former City Council member, Kenneth Fisher, fears that such revisions to the program “could be devastating to Downtown Brooklyn’s residential market.”

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Portion of 421-a Legislation Signed into Law

Governor Eliot Spitzer has signed into law a version of 421-a, a tax abatement policy intended to encourage developers to build affordable housing by offering extended tax breaks. The law includes tighter restrictions for developers to qualify for the abatement which include a requirement that units remain at affordable rates for a period of 35 years. The legislation was hotly debated in both the city and the state because many real estate observers argued that the program was failing to produce enough affordable housing in the city.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

421-A Compromise Reached Between City and State

New York City administration and the State Legislature have reached an agreement on 421-a tax reform. Before the current compromise the Bloomberg administration had threatened to ask Governor Spitzer to veto the bill. The new agreement allows for greater construction of moderate-income housing than allowed by the state legislature’s original bill, but attempts still to deal with state officials fears of gentrification.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Bloomberg Calls For Veto Of State 421-a Legislation

The Bloomberg administration has requested that Governor Spitzer veto the state 421-a bill when it reaches his desk, as it is unhappy with several features of the bill. First, Bloomberg would prefer that the tax credits be available to government-supported middle-income housing. In addition, the city administration would prefer the exclusion zone to be smaller and is opposed to a $300 million tax break provided to Atlantic Yards in the bill. Given that Spitzer has not yet reached a final draft of the bill, legislatures may still have a chance to make amendments that would satisfy city officials, if they wish to do so.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Mayor Displeased with Compromise on Property Tax Abatements

Mayor Bloomberg has directly criticized the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY), a prominent property owner group, for its support of 421-a legislation that differs from the version supported by the mayor. REBNY President Steve Spinola collaborated at the finale of the legislative session with Assemblyman Vito Lopez on a proposal that would extend the exclusionary zone where developers must build affordable housing in exchange for tax breaks to areas of Brooklyn like Crown Heights and Red Hook. While the mayor insists that such an extension will hurt development, Lopez and supporters believe that it will aid lower and middle-income residents.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

421-a Changes Delayed for 6 Months

The recent bill passed to amend 421-a tax incentives is expected to lead to an increase in construction near-term, as developers attempt to construct their market-rate projects before the changes go into effect. The current program of abatements will continue until July 2008, extending the program six months from its initial expiration date of December.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

421-a Bill Reformed

Today New York State Assembly and Senate leaders agreed on a proposed reform of New York City’s 421-a tax exemption plan. This plan will expand the exclusion zone, which dictates how many affordable housing units must be included in new developments in New York City, into 12 neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens, and upper Manhattan that were not included in the original bill.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

421-a Bills In Front of Legislature Match City Council Reccomendations

Identical 421-a bills have been introduced into both the State Assembly and State Senate and are expected to be voted on shortly. The bills match New York City Council’s earlier recommendations that at least 20% of new units in exclusion zones must be set aside for affordable housing in order to qualify for the tax break. The exclusion zone has also been broadened to include more of Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Queens. The Real Estate Board had originally been lobbying for 30% of units to be set aside, while one the opposite side industry trade groups lobbied to prevent expansion of the exclusionary zone. Governor Spitzer is expected to sign off on the bill if it is approved by the legislature.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

421-a Tax Debate Hitting State Legislature

The debate over 421-a tax abatements has moved up to the state level, as the state Legislature must renew the program by the end of the year for it to continue. Several differing proposals exist. The Bloomberg administration is pushing for the comprise worked out by City Council last year, which expands the exclusion zone where creation of affordable housing is a requirement of the program, requires 20% of units in those areas to be affordable, and ends the certificate program allowing the affordable units to actually be in different buildings. Senate Democrats appear to be pushing towards requiring affordable housing city-wide in order to qualify for the tax break, and make the required proportion 30%. The Real Estate Board of New York in contrast wants to preserve the certificate and scale back the exclusion zone.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

State Considers 421-a; Likely to Strengthen Affordable Housing Requirements

As the state legislature prepares to address the 421-a tax reform, multiple bills are being proposed that could restrict its application by enacting stricter requirements before qualifying for the tax break. City Council recently passed a new form of the tax break under which developers must set aside at least 20% of a new building's units for affordable housing in order to qualify for the tax benefits. The benefits will be applicable in Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn and Queens as long as the state legislature reenacts the tax break at the state level. The state is expected to go even farther, requiring that at least 30% of new projects be set aside for affordable housing in order to qualify. Many in the real estate industry oppose the bills on the grounds that stricter requirements will slow development.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

State to Review 421-A Program

The New York State Assembly's Standing Committee on Housing will host a hearing next week in Manhattan to review the 421-a program, which provides tax incentives for real estate developers to build new housing. The city recently passed reforms to the program that now make it more difficult for developers to receive tax breaks unless they provide affordable housing units. A component of the city's 421-a bill included a recommendation to the state that it review the city's "exclusionary zones," which are geographical areas in the city in which no tax incentives are available to developers without provision of affordable housing, every two years. Assembly Member Vito Lopez, chair of the Assembly's Committee on Housing, will moderate the hearing. There is no guarantee that the committee will adopt the city's plan for the program.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Could Affordable Housing Legislation Threaten Development?

The President of the Real Estate Board of New York criticized recent legislation intended to promote affordable housing as overly restrictive and a threat to the housing market. Mr. Spinola believes that certain policies, including the recent announcement that there may be a cap on tax-exempt bonds and the more restrictive proposed changes to the states 421-a program, are threatening developers’ profitability and may lead to a halt in construction. He also believes the tax system is overly burdensome on commercial properties owners relative to private homeowners.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

State Approval of 421-a Program Not Guaranteed

The amended 421-a tax abatement program signed by the Mayor last December and slated to take effect in the city by the end of 2007 still has to gain approval from the New York State Legislature. The newly signed program, which makes it more difficult for real estate developers to receive city tax breaks unless they build affordable housing on site, worries some real estate leaders. Some are concerned that developers will rush to build condominiums before the law takes effect, increasing the supply of housing beyond demand. Others fear that the provision will make it more difficult for the middle-class to afford housing.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Construction Increases Ahead of New 421-a Restrictions

Many developers are working quickly to get construction underway in time to qualify for 421-a tax abatements prior to tightening of the program in 2008. Beginning at that time, developers must set aside 20% of a project’s units to affordable housing in order to qualify for the tax incentives. In order to avoid the new restrictions developers are rushing to begin construction now. Demand for program certificates, which are provided to developers by affordable-housing builders has also increased, driving the price of a certificate up from $13,000 to $15,000. The tax-incentives can be crucial to a project’s profitability, and some which cannot be completed in time may not get built at all.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

HPD Swamped by 421-a Tax-Abatement Applications

The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) is under pressure to deal with a build-up of over 1,000 applications for 421-a tax abatements. Developers currently wait almost a year on average for applications to get approved, and some have complained about the tax burden they are under during the waiting period. HPD is attempting to deal with the problem by altering its hours to allow more time to be spent on processing applications as well as developing an online application system. The department says most of the current delays are caused by incomplete applications.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Rush in Construction Ahead of Changes to 421-A

The number of housing units under construction which will qualify for 421-A tax breaks has spiked as builders are rushing to begin construction before the tax regime becomes more restrictive based on a changes recently approved by the Bloomberg administration. In an effort to avoid those restrictions, developers are pushing construction ahead, with over 13,600 new apartments expected to receive the tax breaks in 2007. In 2004, before changes in the tax code were in discussion, the number of new units built to receive the tax break was only approximately 6,700.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Housing Construction Thriving, but Can’t Match Population Growth

According to the New York Observer, 2005 and 2006 were the strongest years for housing construction in New York City since 1965. Yet despite the strong construction, the number of new home-permits cannot keep up with the booming population growth. The problem is particularly severe in Manhattan and Staten Island, although all boroughs saw a larger increase in residents than they did building permits. The Bloomberg administration has been attempting to address the housing shortage by making development of middle-class and affordable-housing units one of its priorities and by rezoning large portions of the city to allow further residential development. However, so far the incentives have been insufficient, and the recent narrowing of 421-a tax breaks eliminated some additional incentives for developers.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Queens Left Out of 421-A Reforms, Advocates Suggest

Tenant advocates argue that poor and middle-income residents of Queens were ignored last month when the City Council revamped 421-A, a tax system that awards tax breaks to developers who build affordable housing units. The Council’s overhaul of the system, seen as a give-away to luxury developers, allows tax breaks to developers in major areas of Brooklyn and Manhattan only if 20% of constructed units are affordable to low-and median-income residents. In Queens, however, only a geographic area along the East River mandates 20% affordable units. While tenant advocates fear this limited affordability mandate will hurt low-income Queens’ residents, local supporters of the 421-A overhaul believe that Queens would forego necessary investment and development with a greater affordability requirement for developers.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Mayor Bloomberg Approves 421-A Tax Abatement Reforms

Mayor Michael Bloomberg signed Introductory Number 468-A, a bill to reform the City’s 421-A program, which provides tax breaks for housing developers to build “affordable” units. Introductory Number 468-A was a compromise bill that arose from the City Council who disagreed about requirements for developers to satisfy in order to earn tax abatements. The Mayor hailed the bill as a tool to increase the affordability of the City’s housing stock, while the Real Estate Board of New York (REBNY) warned that it will cause less, not more, construction of affordable housing.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Council Compromises on 421-a Tax Abatements

A compromise has apparently been reached between City Council Speaker Christine Queen and Mayor Michael Bloomberg about the City’s 421-A program, which provides tax breaks for housing developers that build “affordable” units. Quinn’s compromise proposal, situated between Bloomberg’s limiting of the exclusion zone for mandatory affordable housing in the City and another council bill’s denial of tax breaks for any development without affordable units, extends the exclusionary zone to more of the City but limits the affordable requirement to 20% of all units. The bill creates a $400-million affordable housing fund. The Council’s Housing and Buildings Committee passed Quinn’s bill 8-2.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Are 421-a Proposals Ignoring Affordable Housing in Queens?

Some believe that the current range of proposals for the 421-a tax abatement program, which rewards the development of affordable housing units, leaves behind a significant portion of Queens. Two bills, one advocated by Speaker Quinn and another by Mayor Bloomberg, fail to expand the territory of mandatory construction of affordable units to large sections of Queens, according to some. Opponents of Quinn and Bloomberg’s bills are advocating Council Member Palma’s proposal, a more progressive alternative to expand the affordable housing stipulation across the entire city and to lower the minimum amount that qualifies a unit as “affordable.”

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

REBNY Argues Against 421-a Changes

REBNY is angered at the compromise 421-a bill and is calling for an alternative that would allow developers to receive the tax abatement if they build the affordable units within the same community board or within half a mile of the project. REBNY argues that without the tax break, new construction in certain neighborhoods will be stymied.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Council Speaker Quinn Offers Middle Ground On Affordable Housing

City Council Speaker Christine Quinn offered a compromise proposal between Mayor Bloomberg and nearly a third of the Council for developing affordable housing units in the city. Quinn’s proposal doubles Bloomberg’s “geographic exclusion zone,” areas where developers must build affordable housing to qualify for tax breaks. However, the Speaker’s proposal leaves the percentage of units dedicated to low- and moderate-income housing at 20, a figure lower than the 30% minimum proposal by Councilmembers Palma, Yassky, and others. Mayor Bloomberg endorsed Speaker Quinn’s bill.

Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page

Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy | NYU School of Law | 40 Washington Square South, Suite 314-H | New York, NY 10012 | 212-998-6713